Character  &  Context

The Science of Who We Are and How We Relate
Editors: Mark Leary, Shira Gabriel, Brett Pelham
Mar 06, 2020

How We Can “See” a New Way to Exercise Faster, Better, and More Often

by Emily Balcetis
illustration of a runner crossing the finish line

One night, I found myself sitting alongside a rubber track in an old gymnasium in Brooklyn, New York.  Clipboards in hand and pens at the ready, I was the odd one out—not because I was suited up for science rather than sport, but because sitting around me were some of the fastest men in the world. Here, an elite team of runners called Zenith Velocity gather each week to train.

One member of the group was the fastest man out of Nigeria. Another was the third-quickest Trinidadian, who ran alongside Usain “Lightning” Bolt, the fastest human alive. And a third runner, Lalonde Gordon, was a double Olympic bronze medalist and the first Tobagonian to medal at any Olympic games. Before they quite literally sprinted off their blocks, these world class athletes took some time to talk to me about the strategies they use to trounce the competition. And the lessons they taught me are ones I have taught to hundreds of other people to help them walk faster, run better, and do it all over again.

What my conversations with the Zenith Velocity team revealed  was that these record-breaking athletes attributed their success on the track to  a very specific way of looking at their visual environments while they ran—and that was to assume a narrow field of view. Although tracking the competition is tempting, every one of the athletes said he narrowed his visual focus on a target he chose up ahead. The shorts of the  person in front of him. The curve in the track. A point just beyond the finish line. More than anything else, these runners were confident that this way of orienting their visual attention helps them perform better.

New research  that I have published with my colleagues, Shana Cole, Matthew Riccio, and Dustin Duncan, found that although these athletes' accomplishments were unique, the visual experiences that marked their faster paces were not. We conducted a survey of 195 men and women who, on average, were considered overweight based on their body mass index (BMI). We found that those people who more frequently narrowed their visual focus while exercising reported walking or running a mile at a faster pace. To put the difference in perspective, those who reported that they frequently rather than sometimes used a narrowed style of attention, for instance, quickened their pace by a minute and forty-one seconds per mile.

The members of the Zenith Velocity team reported focusing their gaze but also noted that what they set their sights on mattered. In the same way as these pro athletes, exercise hobbyists we questioned reported that the visual appearance of their neighborhoods had a direct impact on the quality of their workouts. Those living in San Francisco, Boston, Washington, D.C., and New York City who reported having interesting things in their neighborhoods that captured their focus reported being more physically active than people who lived in neighborhoods with fewer things that caught their eye.

Identifying the visual tools that quickened the pace for some served as inspiration for others. My research team found that we could teach people to focus their attention more narrowly, a tactic that people could adopt and use well after leaving our lab to improve the quality of their exercise. We trained 61 men and women to adopt a constricted field of view, to imagine that a spotlight shed its light on only one target up ahead. We contrasted tactic this with a natural style of attention in which 60 men and women were asked to look more broadly around them.

image of a finish line sign in a park

What we might see in our environment as we look around with natural, broad attention.
 

image of a finish line sign in a park with surrounding area blurred

What we might see in our environment as we look with narrowed attention.
 

We encouraged our research participants to go for five 15-minute walks over the course of the next seven days and use one of these two forms of visual attention as they did. Using phone apps that tracked their movements for the next seven days, we found that people who adopted a narrow focus walked a quarter of mile farther on each walk and took 85% more steps per walk compared to people who looked around as they naturally do. Moreover, a follow-up study found that narrowed rather than natural attention increased the number of walks people took in a week from 3.5 to 4.2, on average.

In our research, keeping your eyes on the prize was not a metaphorical or motivational slogan but a literal directive for how people might look at the worlds in which they live. Among people who used this tactic of narrowed focus—whether they did it naturally or learned it from us—the frequency and efficiency of their exercise showed marked improvement. But why? Drawing from other investigations we conducted on the psychological impact of narrowed focus, we found that when people narrowed their attentional focus, the target they were hoping to meet seemed 20-30% closer, they assessed the challenge as far less daunting, and they reported that the experience required 17% less exertion.

Our eyes are powerful and largely untapped resources at our disposal for shaping our experience—on and off the track, whether we're aspiring to get in the Olympics or just our skinny jeans. Importantly, the technique of narrowed focus is effective for people who are already in shape as well as for those who are struggling to get there, for those living in under-served communities and ones in more affluent ones, for both men and women, and for people of all ages.  Tactics such as narrowed focus that lead us to see exercise as easier might actually make it become so.


For Further Reading

Balcetis, E., Riccio, M. T., Duncan, D. T., & Cole, S. (2020). Keeping the Goal in Sight: Testing the Influence of Narrowed Visual Attention on Physical Activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(3), 485-496.
 

Emily Balcetis is an Associate Professor of Psychology at New York University and the author of Clearer, Closer, Better: How Successful People See the World.

About our Blog

Why is this blog called Character & Context?

Everything that people think, feel, and do is affected by some combination of their personal characteristics and features of the social context they are in at the time. Character & Context explores the latest insights about human behavior from research in personality and social psychology, the scientific field that studies the causes of everyday behaviors.  

Search the Blog

Get Email Updates from the Blog